The way this is written
was kind of difficult to understand because of the way the author speaks in
these kind of "metaphors" when he is talking about, or describing something.
But otherwise, what I got from this reading was that this author views
gardens as a form of art and says that they are very symbolic and have a lot of
meaning. Throughout the reading he talks about all different types of gardens
like from historical gardens to new gardens and gardens from all over the
world. He also describes them all in great detail.
As you keep reading the author just
keeps on describing all these different places and how gardens differ
everywhere. The author does this by emphasizing on what is special about that
specific type of garden and what differentiates it from the others. The reading
comes to an end by saying that gardens always mean something else and that man
always uses one thing to say another. I feel like a saying that would apply
here would be "life imitates art" as cheesy as that may sound it is
true according to what the author thinks about how the outside is arranged to
suit the inside.
You write, "The reading comes to an end by saying that gardens always mean something else and that man always uses one thing to say another." That is a pretty good definition of metaphor. Did you look up any of the famous gardens mentioned: Versailles, Boboli, Bomarzo, Tivoli? Bernini's Four rivers fountain? The visuals may help you understand the reading.
ReplyDelete